16 hours ago
March 28, 2012
Analysis of the goal conceded against Bolton (27/3)
Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.
You can also hear me on The Fighting Cock podcast.
Kevin Davies’ goal -Bolton get some joy down their right; Klasnic finds space in behind King, picks out Davies with a fine cross, and Davies steers the ball beyond Cudicini.
Firstly, without wanting to seem too bitter, a foul should have been given on Bale earlier in the move when Alonso bundled him to the ground from behind.
Nigel Reo-Coker has possession, and with Spurs having recently shifted to 4-4-2, he finds a little space in midfield.
He slides a ball down the line for Klasnic, who pulls away from King a little too easily.
Klasnic has a yard on King, and Davies has pulled away from Nelsen’s shoulder with Walker, who was otherwise exceptional on the night, caught ball-watching.
The cross is an excellent one – in the “corridor of uncertainty” (there’s one for Football Clichés!). Nelsen throws himself at it, and does get a toe to the ball.
But he can’t deflect it away from Davies, who calmly sends the ball back across goal with his left shin.
Cudicini is quite slow down and, having seen to be covering his far post, he almost dives away from it.
While you’re here, why not check out my ‘Summer Rebuilding?‘ article from Tuesday?!
Tagged goal analysis, newsnow
March 27, 2012
Summer rebuilding?
Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.
You can also hear me on The Fighting Cock podcast.
In my first ever blog article, around this time three years ago, I wrote about how many players Redknapp had managed to trim from our squad. When he first arrived at the club, he was famously quoted as saying “We have about 40 or 50 players who sit down for dinner at the club every day but only 14 or 15 of them are good enough to play in the Premier League.”
I was pleased with the work that he had done and, in starting afresh, I hoped that he would build a squad for the future. I finished that article by saying “Overhauls clearly don’t work, and I hope we’ve learnt that now.” I stand by that statement and feel that, although Redknapp has overseen a number of young players coming into the first team, he has also somewhat backed us into a corner with his short-term signings, and it now seems that another squad overhaul is imminent – whether it is him presiding over it or not.
Outgoings
We have a number of players likely to leave come the summer:
Emmanuel Adebayor
Jermaine Jenas
Niko Kranjcar
David Bentley
Carlo Cudicini
Heurelho Gomes
Steven Pienaar
Sébastien Bassong
Vedran Corluka
Kyle Naughton
Giovani dos Santos
Ben Alnwick
Bongani Khumalo
Simon Dawkins
I would also assume that some younger players will move on – potentially:
Jonathan Obika
Oscar Jansson
Kudus Oyenuga
We also have another group of players who could all potentially leave the club:
Jermain Defoe
William Gallas
Ryan Nelsen
Louis Saha
Ledley King (retirement?)
Yago Falque
Danny Rose
Ryan Mason
Dean Parrett
John Bostock
Mirko Ranieri
Nathan Byrne
Jake Nicholson
That is ignoring Luka Modric, who was so keen to leave last summer.
Of course, it is unlikely that all of these players will leave in one hit, but I would certainly expect them to all leave over the next two to three years. It’s also worth noting that not all of them will need replacing as some have been used sparingly, and some have never been used. Having said that, our squad will need a lot of strengthening – more on this later.
Redknapp’s Spurs transfer record
Redknapp has had some successes in the transfer market since he joined the club in October 2008. Undoubted positives in Friedel, Parker, Adebayor, Gallas, van der Vaart, Walker, Kaboul, along with lesser triumphs Kranjcar, Crouch, Defoe, Bassong and Palacios have improved the squad (to different extents!). It still seems, though, that there is a short-termist strategy.
Initially Redknapp brought in players to get us out of a sticky situation quickly, and it is striking that a number of these players were gone within a couple of years – Palacios, Chimbonda, Keane, Crouch, Gudjohnsen, Pletikosa. This has continued – listed below with the most recent to join first, it’s interesting to note that the average age of his four most recent signings is 34.
Ryan Nelson
Louis Saha
Brad Friedel
Scott Parker
Yago Falqué
Emmanuel Adebayor
Souleymane Coulibaly
Steven Pienaar
Bongani Khumalo
William Gallas
Rafael van der Vaart
Stipe Pletikosa
Sandro Ranieri
Younes Kaboul
Eidur Gudjohnsen
Niko Kranjcar
Sebastien Bassong
Peter Crouch
Kyle Naughton
Kyle Walker
Robbie Keane
Pascal Chimbonda
Carlo Cudicini
Wilson Palacios
Jermain Defoe
After the initial glut of seemingly interim signings, one may have thought that Redknapp would try to build a squad for the future. Whilst it is true that he has overseen some young players being brought to the club, there have been as many older players – Gudjohnsen and Gallas for example – who added experience to an inexperience squad, but also needed/will need replacing within a short period of time.
It is the short-termist strategy that could cause problems this summer, and that is ignoring Friedel, who may be with us for another year or two at the most, but cannot go on forever. I listed 31 players above (including Modric). Of these, there are 15 that are in our 25-man squad. If we were to sell/release half of these (which is not unlikely), we would need to make a significant number of purchases to get the squad back up to strength for next year.
With question marks over our management going forward, no Director of Football, and no obvious transfer strategy, it is very difficult to foresee this panning out in a sensible, planned, targeted way. Of course, the quality of potential signings depends much on whether we qualify for The Champions League. If we were qualify, we should be able to attract good players to the club – potentially better than what we have currently; but even if we were to make seven or eight solid signings, they could take time to adapt to life at Tottenham (or this country) and so there could be a “settling in” period.
Why has this happened?
Through taking a more measured approach to signings, we could have avoided this “up in the air” feeling that we will have at end of the season, which would obviously be multiplied significantly if the manager and coaching staff were to change as well. So who is to blame for this? Is it Redknapp’s fault? Does the chairman have to take his share of the blame?
Football has changed so much – a transfer strategy for a club of the stature of Spurs has to effectively involve spending big transfer fees and big wages on a relatively small pool of players. Redknapp has, to an extent, used the “moneyball” approach – picking up cheap/free/loan signings who, although on big wages, will not cost much to bring in, and will sign relatively short-term contracts. Whilst it means that we’ll have to keep adjusting the squad year on year, it is relatively low-risk which could be seen as wise when it is difficult to make predictions on where the club will finish in the league.
Levy has presumably accepted this approach realising that if we finish 5th without having spent big, and with high earners nearing the end of their contracts, he is in a stronger position than finishing 5th having made a Liverpool-esque outlay. He can move on a lot of big earners relatively easily, whilst gradually taking chances on younger players who may turn out to be Bale/Walker style “bargains” (and by that I mean that their respective values have rocketed, rather than them costing little in the first place). And on the upside, if we finish in the top four he can use the bigger budget to either tie down players to big contracts or invest heavily in the right players to maintain that position.
I can certainly see the case, but still see the approach as a gamble. The amount of transactions required over the next couple of years means that we will be totally dismantling and rebuilding our squad (although hopefully not the first XI), and that is always a risky thing to attempt. Can we maintain stability? Can we integrate a large number of new players at once?
Three years on, and having said that “overhauls clearly don’t work”, we have an overhaul to look forward to in the summer – let’s just hope that, whoever our manager is, he focuses on having suitable back-ups in every area of the pitch.
March 22, 2012
Analysis of the goal conceded against Stoke (21/3)
Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.
You can also hear me on The Fighting Cock podcast.
Cameron Jerome’s goal – Spurs are undone by a Stoke set piece (not for the first time!), as Huth wins a header from a Pennant free-kick, the ball comes off Shawcross, and Jerome is there to finish at the back post.
Pennant’s cross is aimed at Huth, an obvious target. Note how many of Stoke’s “big men” are in the box, and how few players we have defending.
Huth’s header deflects off Shawcross’ shoulder…
As the ball is about to strike Shawcross, note the position of Jerome – number 33.
He continues his run, whilst Bale slows down, leaving him with a tap-in.
Various issues here:
Poor marking.
Lack of tall defensive players (Sandro could have started in my opinion).
And, above all, a lack of desire to get the ball clear.
Tagged goal analysis, newsnow
March 11, 2012
Analysis of the goal conceded against Everton (10/3)
Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.
You can also hear me on The Fighting Cock podcast.
Nikica Jelavić’s goal – Baines plays a superb ball into Osman, who easily wriggles away from Kaboul before playing in Jelavić, who scores with a controlled first-time effort.
Leighton Baines has possession on the left and looks to feed a pass into Osman, the spare man in midfield.
Baines has by-passed our two central midfield players with his pass, and we are left two against two at the back. This means that there’s a lot of responsibility on the centre backs to defend responsibly.
Unfortunately Kaboul commits himself and is easily turned by Osman. Notice King’s position with Jelavić at this point – gradually he has to show less interest in marking him, and more in getting to the ball.
Osman is a hugely underrated player, but the ease in which he turns away from Kaboul is surprising, especially given Kaboul’s excellent form.
As Osman has got in behind, King has had to come across to the ball, and Jelavić has intelligently peeled away into a great position.
Too many bodies swarm around the ball, and nobody picks up Jelavić, who admittedly still has a lot to do. Does Friedel need to be quite so far over?
He finishes superbly though – a first-time side footed effort into Friedel’s far corner.
Tagged goal analysis, newsnow