Analysis of the goal conceded against Wigan (24/9)

Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.

Diame’s goalAssou-Ekotto gifts possession to Wigan, and the ball reaches Diame, who holds off Kaboul and finds the bottom corner from the edge of the box.


Assou-Ekotto has possession in his own box, after a Wigan attack breaks down. Parker (to his right) is the easy pass, or he can pass the the ball down the line for Bale.


Instead, his attempted pass is too close to Stam, and the ball loops back into the Spurs box.


King competes, and the ball ends up back with Stam.


He plays an intelligent first-time pass into Diame, who has Kaboul closing in on him.


Diame is very strong, and holds off Kaboul, but Parker comes along to mop up…


For some reason (presumably he doesn’t want to give away a free kick), Parker pulls out of a challenge, and instead runs straight past Diame.


Which allows Diame to turn and find the bottom right corner of Friedel’s goal – it’s a great finish, and the keeper has little chance.

All in all it was a very nervy second half performance from Spurs which was in total contrast to the dominant, exciting first half, where we scored two good goals, but also missed a number of chances; a free header for Kaboul, a free header for Walker, Adebayor’s first time effort when he could have taken a touch, Bale’s shot when he should have squared to Modric, etc etc. As a result of not extending our lead, Wigan’s goal created a real sense of tension, and the team seem suddenly sapped of confidence.

The result, however, is a good one and, whilst I criticise Parker for his lack of challenge in the move that lead to the goal, he generally had a decent enough game -he made five tackles, eight interceptions (which was more than double that of anyone else on pitch), 85 passes (again, the most on pitch) at 91% completion. Assou-Ekotto, on the other hand, did not have such a good match. Having been at fault for the goal, he dawdled on the ball later in the half and almost cost us again. He also had the lowest pass completion of our outfield players, primarily because he often elected to play a hopeful, lofted pass forward rather than to turn inside. However, he has had a throat infection over the last few days and almost missed the match, which may go some way to explaining his poor decision-making.

Expected line-up for PAOK

Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.

Rumours suggest that the Spurs line-up for tomorrow’s game will be:

Gomes
Walker Corluka Bassong Townsend
Falque Livermore Carroll dos Santos
Kane
Pavlyuchenko

Using the squad towards the bottom of our home page on the UEFA site, we can have a guess at the subs too – Cudicini, Nicholson, Fredericks, Pritchard, Stewart, Barthram, Parrett.

To give a brief run-down of the players that you may not have heard about:

Kevin Stewart – a calm defender who can play anywhere across the back-line but is better at centre back. A good reader of the game, with decent ability on the ball.

Jack Barthram – an energetic full-back, who mainly plays on the right (and is right-footed) but has played on the left. He is a very committed, hard-working player who likes to bomb forward in support.

Alex Pritchard – an inventive link-player who schemes in midfield, and likes to break forward. He has a good scoring record at youth level, and was fantastic in the recent NextGen Series game against Inter Milan. His superb free-kick is at the end of this video.

Europa League – a nuisance?

Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.

There has been much comment this week about the Europa League – whether we should take it seriously, whether we will take it seriously, and whether Harry Redknapp’s comments about it being “a nuisance” were ill-advised.

Should we take the Europa League seriously?

Is wining a trophy or finishing 4th more important? Can we compete in Premier League and the Europa League without making mass changes for each game? If not, should we prioritise one over the other?

I don’t think there’s a simple answer to any of those questions. Fans are divided on whether they would trade finishing 4th for winning the Europa League – the “cup glory” vs “Champions League” debate, which has been had many times in pubs and on message boards over the last few years. On that issue, Redknapp therefore cannot really win.

I would personally argue, however, that we do not need a full-strength team to progress beyond the group stage of the Europa League. Our squad is currently light due to injury, but when players are back (and most are progressing well on that front), we can almost field two full teams of experienced, quality players – the second best of these should be good enough to get us out of the group in my opinion.

Ignoring that, it is interesting to look at our results in league matches after the Champions League games last year.

Young Boys A 17th August
Stoke Award A 21st August – WON

Young Boys H 25th August
Wigan Athletic H 28th August – LOST

Werder Bremen A 14th September
Wolves H 18th September – WON

FC Twente H 29th September
Aston Villa H 2nd October – WON

Inter Milan A 20th October
Everton 23rd October – DREW

Inter Milan H 2nd November
Bolton A 6th November – LOST

Werder Bremen H 24th November
Liverpool H 28th November – WON

FC Twente A 7th December
Chelsea H 12th December – DREW

AC Milan A 15th February
Blackpool A 22nd February – LOST * 7 day gap.

AC Milan H 9th March
West Ham H 19th March – DREW * 10 day gap.

Real Madrid A 5th April
Stoke H 9th April – WON

Real Madrid H 13th April
Arsenal H 20th April – DREW * 7 day gap.

If I had the time, I would look at points achieved in the games after Champions League matches, compared to points achieved in other games, and also the number of changes made to the starting eleven for each game. As it is, I think it’s fair to say that we didn’t do that badly in matches when we had played a European game a few days before, so Redknapp’s insistence on making wholesale changes is perhaps not as essential as he thinks.

Development squad involvement

That said, I personally think that the Europa League is a perfect opportunity to give young players a chance to progress, away from the rigours of the Premier League. Liverpool saw last season how it is possible to use a blend of youth and experience in their Europa League teams, and reaped the benefits of giving youth a chance when the likes of Spearing, Kelly, Wilson, Shelvey, etc gave them genuine options at the end of the season (and are still in and around their first team squad).

Our development squad is full of young players who are now at the point where they need to be given the occasional game to see where they are in terms of their progress – players like Townsend, Carroll, Kane, who have been out on loan and done well, and now need to be integrated into their first team squad and given a taste of first team football at Spurs.

“A nuisance”

Redknapp’s declaration that the Europa League is “a nuisance” is frustrating on a number of levels. Firstly, it shows that he doesn’t see the competition as a priority or one that he’s bothered about winning, which irritates the fans (particularly those that want to win a trophy at any cost).

Secondly, if he does give young players a chance to impress (and it seems that this is the route that he’s taking), it doesn’t send a good message; how do they feel knowing that they are being used as fodder in a competition he doesn’t care about? Does this motivate them to perform?

Ticket prices

The final issue is a relatively simple one, but one that many would see as the most important – ticket prices. If Redknapp is going to play a second (or even third) string side (which, at the moment seems to be his intention), the club should consider lowering ticket prices for the Europa League matches accordingly. Our fans, I’m sure, are not travelling to Greece expecting to see a full strength team, but I think a number of people will be disappointed if we do not put out some senior professionals.

The talk after the Hearts home game was that many were disappointed with the showing. Whilst I am genuinely excited about watching our Academy products, I can understand that many fans are not, and paying a substantial entrance fee to see 18 year olds that they have not heard of is not everyone’s cup of tea. If the club wants to sell out the home legs and create a good atmosphere, they need to meet fans halfway.

Our squad under Redknapp – a constant work in progress

Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.

I have been clear in my support of Redknapp’s on-pitch achievements thus far, and I do think that until January of this year, he was doing a great job – delivering over-par achievements.

The majority of my criticism of Redknapp has been based on his off-pitch activity. I will not go into the detail of what I see as his short-comings, as they were covered more succinctly than I could ever have managed in Ewan Roberts‘ superb article – One In The Hole blog.

The issue I would like to touch on is the constant “work in progress” state of our squad. Our signings this summer have been hailed by some, and I take the point that we have addressed key areas, and that the players that we have signed should be good signings for this season. However, Friedel at 40, and on a two-year contract, Adebayor on a one-year loan, and Parker (31 in October, albeit on a four-year contract) are not long-term signings; they are signings that will leave us in transition again in the near future.

We now have similar issues in almost every area of our team – players will need replacing in the next one/two/three years, and that is ignoring the fact that our manager is unlikely to be in his post this time next year.

Goalkeepers

Gomes, linked with a late move away, and seemingly not trusted anymore by Redknapp.

Brad Friedel, 40 years old with two years left on his contract.

Carlo Cudicini, 37 years old with one year left on his contract.

Defenders

William Gallas, 34 years old with two years left on his contract.

Ledley King, 30 years old with one year left on his contract and well-known injury problems.

Midfielders

Scott Parker, 31 in October and with a history of injuries.

Luka Modric, almost certain to leave in a year unless we challenge for the title.

Forwards

Emmanuel Adebayor, on a one-year loan and on wages that we could not match on a permanent basis.

Jermain Defoe, 28 years old and seemingly declining at a rapid rate.

Roman Pavlyuchenko, 29 years old and losing value at a similarly rapid rate.

We have also failed to permanently ship out some of the fringe players that Redknapp clearly doesn’t have faith in. Jenas and Bentley have moved, but only on loan. Bassong’s agent confirmed that a deal to QPR was all but tied up, and would presumably have gone ahead had we signed Cahill. Alnwick has managed to cling on to his Spurs career and was given a one year contract in the summer. Giovani Dos Santos failed to secure a move away. None of these players are likely to play more than 5 or 10 games this season.

Redknapp has admitted to interest in Phil Neville and Joe Cole, and has also been linked to Craig Bellamy and Owen Hargreaves. The constant links with ageing players who have question marks over either their fitness, ability, or mental state is worrying.

I have gone into the last few windows thinking what a large amount of work we have had to do – not just in terms of signing top-class players, but also in clearing the decks. The list above highlights the amount of work that Redknapp’s replacement will have, and in my opinion could tempt Levy into another “Director of Football” structure once Redknapp departs.

03/09/11 Tottenham Hotspur U18s 0-4 West Ham United U18s, Spurs Lodge

Follow me on Twitter – @WindyCOYS.

Jonathan Miles (18)

Jack Barthram (17) Kevin Stewart (17) Daniel Day (17) Grant Ward (16*)

Jack Munns (17) Ronnie Hawkins (17)

Freddie Champion (17) Lee Angol (17) Rueben Lameiras (16*)

Shaq Coulthirst (16)

Subs:

Kenneth McEvoy (16) for Freddie Champion, 46 minutes.

Victor Zapata-Caceido (16*) for Rueben Lameires, 46 minutes.

Sam Smith (16*) for Ronnie Hawkins, 83minutes.

*age unknown, so best estimate given.

The Spurs Academy were sent back down to earth with a bump this morning, following Wednesday’s 7-1 win against Inter. Of those that started on Wednesday, only Day, Barthram, and Stewart remained, whilst Hawkins, who was a sub in that game, started this one.

The rest of today’s team was made up of a mixture of second years (Munns, Champion, Angol) and first years (Lameiras, Ward, Coulthirst), for whom it is still early in their apprenticeships. In goal was Jonathan Miles, who carried on to a third year of his apprenticeship in the summer.

Daniel Day started in an unfamiliar centre-back position, and it took him a few minutes to settle early on. There were early openings at either end – Stewart misjudging a bouncing ball allowing Lee to get in but head over the bar, and Ward putting in a dangerous cross which was well defended. West Ham took the lead when they played through our deep midfield and defence worryingly easily, before 16-year old Kieran Sadlier turned well and slotted his shot into the bottom left corner.

There was then a stoppage whilst Declan Hunt, who injured himself in fouling Munns, had to be replaced by Lamarr Hurley.

Ronnie Hawkins was looking useful in midfield – picking out Grant Ward with a superb pass, which he failed to control, and also working well as a defensive shield. Angol ran from the right touchline across the penalty box, but his lay-off to Munns resulted in a wayward shot, well over the bar. A firm Lameiras effort from distance was then well blocked, before the game went into a very congested, cagey spell, where the two 4-2-3-1 formations seemed to cancel one another out.

With five minutes to go until the break, things suddenly became more open. First, Barthram made a bustling run to get himself into a great position, before wasting his crossing opportunity, before Ronnie Hawkins against switched play brilliantly to Freddie Champion, who found Barthram in space, but his low cross into the box was stabbed clear. Champion then played a cross-field, and Ward found Coulthirst, who couldn’t quite make space for himself to shoot, and the move fizzled out. At the other end, Dominic Vose overlapped well, and Miles made a good stop at his near post.

Spurs changed things at half-time, taking off the ineffective Champion and Lameiras, and replacing them with first years Kenneth McEvoy and Victor Zapata-Caceido. They played much higher up the pitch, McEvoy to the right and Zapata-Caceido to the left, with Angol a little deeper in more of a 4-3-3. Spurs started the half strongly, and Coulthirst had a superb run down the left channel – he didn’t have too many options, but a ball across the face of goal seemed the best bet. Instead he tried to sneak it in at the near post, and the goalkeeper saved. Hawkins again switched play beautifully to find Barthram, who drove forward and found Zapata-Caceido, who had a shot deflected wide.

Blair Turgott, West Ham’s right winger, who had looked the best attacking player on display, ended the game as a contest on 63 minutes. He turned well, made space for himself, and found the back of the net from outside the box. The ball didn’t find the corner, but it had enough power to easily beat Miles.

On 67 minutes, Day intercepted well and charged forward, finding Coulthirst. He drove forward well and this time he did smash it across the face of goal, but Zapata-Caceido was unable to get on the end of it.

It was 3-0 on 70 minutes, and this one was all down to Miles. He rushed out of goal to meet a loose ball but, presumably wary of picking the ball up on the edge of the box, let the ball run past him. Stewart made a desperate lunging challenge on the eventual scorer, but the ball fell kindly into his path and he tapped home from a couple of yards out.

Spurs nearly pulled a goal back when a typically powerful Munns run ended in him being brought down, and Hawkins drew a good save from the goalkeeper. Minutes later, a Stewart effort from the edge of the box landed at the feet of Zapata-Caceido, whose shot was blocked. It came back out to Stewart, but he fired wide and over.

It was 4-0 with ten minutes remaining, and it was Miles again who made a mess of things. He came out to the edge of the box to try to deal with a high ball that Stewart and a forward were underneath. He missed the ball totally and, as it popped up off the striker’s head, it ran kindly and left him with a tap-in.

Sam Smith replaced Hawkins in midfield as Spurs searched for a consolation. Lee Angol’s high shot was tipped over the bar, and Sam Smith found Coulthirst with a firm pass to the edge of the area. Coulthirst laid the ball off to Zapata-Caceido, who couldn’t beat the keeper from a great position.

Jonathan Miles 3 – I don’t like to be too critical of young players, but this was a bad day at the office for Jonathan. He made a couple of decent saves in the first half, but there are question marks over whether Turgott’s strike should have beaten him, and his two blunders in the second half gave West Ham a scoreline that really flattered them.

Jack Barthram 6 – Put in a typically hard-working display, and did well defensively. Will be a little disappointed with his delivery having got into some decent areas.

Kevin Stewart 6 – Made a slight misjudgement early on, but was otherwise calm and composed. Uses the ball well from the back.

Daniel Day 6 – After a slightly iffy start he settled in well, and worked nicely with Stewart. Won headers despite being significantly shorter than Elliot Lee (who had, incidentally, scored a hat-trick in each of his previous three league games!).

Grant Ward 5 – Struggled a little defensively against the excellent Blair Turgott, but got forward well in support. I look forward to seeing more of him.

Jack Munns 5 – Worked hard, and put in some import challenged, but his passing was quite erratic.

Ronnie Hawkins 6 – When he’s good, he’s very good – his vision and passing are to be admired, and he is a useful defensive screen – but his head seems to drop quite easily at times.

Freddie Champion 4 – Dallied on the ball too often, which was a shame as he has a decent touch and seems to have a reasonable range of passing.

Lee Angol 4 – Struggled today. In the first half we needed him to pull deeper to receive the ball and help link play, but he always seemed to be on the periphery.

Rueben Lameiras 4 – My first look at him, and he didn’t particularly impress today. Seems to have a good touch, but was unable to impose himself on a decent full-back.

Shaq Coulthirst 5 – Lively as ever, but unable to get a clear sight of goal. Had one chance to score, but really should have gone across the keeper.

Kenneth McEvoy 5 – Struggled to get the better of Daniel Potts.

Victor Zapata-Caceido 5 – Had a couple of openings where he may have done a bit better.

Sam Smith – showed some composure and assured touches/sensible passing.

Not a day to remember for the young Spurs side, but certainly not as one-sided as the score suggests.